Talk:Edwin Ramsey
Latest comment: 8 years ago by Jenks24 in topic Requested move 2 September 2015
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Edwin Ramsey article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
A fact from Edwin Ramsey appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 11 September 2015 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
It is requested that an image or photograph be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
Requested move 2 September 2015 edit
- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: moved to Edwin Ramsey. Jenks24 (talk) 09:20, 17 September 2015 (UTC)
Edwin P. Ramsey → ? – Should be either Edwin Ramsey or Edwin Price Ramsey. Sources use either one of names, including the current title. The autobiography uses "Price"; some book, "P"; another book, neither. This might come down to divided usage. George Ho (talk) 01:04, 2 September 2015 (UTC) --Relisted. Natg 19 (talk) 20:11, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
- Speedy close - Already moved. Shhhhwwww!! (talk) 18:23, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
- Four of the refs say Edwin Ramsey, vs. two for Edwin P. Ramsey, so I have no strong objection to the move. Clarityfiend (talk) 19:35, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
Cavalry in 21st century edit
I wonder if some of the cavalry employments in the 21st century could be described as "charges"? — Brianhe (talk) 21:30, 11 September 2015 (UTC)