Talk:Edwin R. Fellows

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Expansion edit

I have obtained some sources to be the basis for expansion of this article. They are:

  • Broehl, Wanye G., Jr. (1959). Precision Valley—The Machine Tool Companies of Springfield, Vermont. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall. p. 273. {{cite book}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |coauthors= (help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  • Hubbard, Guy (July 10, 1924), "Development of Machine Tools in New England—The nineteenth article", The American Machinist, 62 (2): 65–68 {{citation}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |month= (help)CS1 maint: date and year (link)
  • 50 Years of Progress, Springfield, Vermont: The Fellows Gear Shaper Co., 1945, p. 48 {{citation}}: Cite has empty unknown parameters: |chapterurl= and |month= (help)
  • The Involute Gear—Simply Explained (Fifth ed.), Springfield, Vermont: The Fellows Gear Shaper Co., 1939 [1930], p. 63 {{citation}}: Cite has empty unknown parameters: |chapterurl= and |month= (help)

User:HopsonRoad 22:21, 26 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

Sweet. The expansion looks awesome already, even just so far! — ¾-10 18:13, 27 November 2010 (UTC)Reply
Thank you, 3/4-10. Could you help me by getting rid of the image size artifact in the infobox and causing the "Broehl" references to link from Notes to References? I'll be away for a while, so this is probably all I'll do, for now. Cheers, User:HopsonRoad 19:18, 27 November 2010 (UTC)Reply
Will do. The expansion is very substantial. So no worries about "for now"; it stands on its own merits even as-is! Of course, any future development will also be great. In the meantime I'll take a look at adding on any niceties (Harvnb etc). — ¾-10 19:38, 27 November 2010 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for your interest and your kind offer. User:LilHelpa fixed the infobox and I managed to figure out what was wrong with the Harvnb. Cheers, User:HopsonRoad 22:28, 27 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

Fellows Gear Shaper Co. picture edit

I have a B&W version of the present-day image of the former manufacturing facility. Should I use it in order to maintain the B&W theme or should I retain the current version in order to bridge the history across to the present? User:HopsonRoad 18:52, 25 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

I definitely prefer the latter option, personally. Thanks so much for providing this photo! It's even got the panoramic view. — ¾-10 19:05, 25 December 2010 (UTC)Reply
BTW, I took the liberty of getting rid of the bot's "no license" warning at Commons by inserting a license. If you prefer a different license, feel free to modify. Thanks. — ¾-10 19:16, 25 December 2010 (UTC)Reply
Thanks very much! I hit the [Return] button prematurely and that was a consequence. I infer that your preference is to retain the current color picture. Reply needed only if my inference is incorrect. Cheers, User:HopsonRoad 19:20, 25 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Edwin R. Fellows. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:50, 31 December 2017 (UTC)Reply