Talk:Edwin Maxwell (attorney general)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Tomandjerry211 (alt) (talk · contribs) 21:46, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

• Will be starting soon.--Tomandjerry211 (alt) (talk) 21:46, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

---

West Virginian: Sorry for the delay, comments below:

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

Issues

• Four citations for one point seems excessive
• It is unnecessary to put citations like this:"Aaaaaa.[1] Bbbbbb.[1]"
• The last fact in the "Political and Judicial career" lacks a citation.
• Some of the long cites need identifiers.

--Tomandjerry211 (alt) (talk) 23:48, 8 September 2015 (UTC)

• Tomandjerry211 (alt), thank you for the thorough and comprehensive review! I have removed an inline citation from the sequence of four in a row, as it was unnecessary. I also consolidated similar inline citations to allow for greater flow, per your suggestion. The citation added for the last fact in "Political and Judicial career" covers that last sentence. As for the long cites, could you explain what you mean by identifiers? Once I know what you mean, I will implement your suggestion immediately. Thanks again for the review! -- West Virginian (talk) 00:08, 11 September 2015 (UTC)

• West Virginian: An identifier is sth that is like a isbn, oclc, or issn that is used to identify a long cite.--Tomandjerry211 (alt) (talk) 10:43, 11 September 2015 (UTC)

• Tomandjerry211 (alt), I have added dashes to the ISBNs and added OCLC numbers to those two articles that previously did not have one. Thank you for this suggestion. Take another look and let me know if you see anything else! -- West Virginian (talk) 12:12, 11 September 2015 (UTC)

• Passing, Well done.--Tomandjerry211 (alt) (talk) 20:08, 11 September 2015 (UTC)

• Tomandjerry211 (alt), thank you for performing this review. I look forward to working with you again soon on another review! -- West Virginian (talk) 22:40, 11 September 2015 (UTC)