Talk:Edward Williams (Victorian judge)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

England Low‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Australia: Victoria / Law Low‑importance

	Australia portal Edward Williams (Victorian judge) is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Victoria (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian law (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of Victoria.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Should "slaveholder" be in the lead sentence? edit

Latest comment: 5 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

I removed " and slaveholder" from the lead sentence based on reading the full two paragraphs of the reference and also his entry in the Legacies of British slave-ownership database which indicate that Edward Williams was a beneficiary of compensation, but did not directly own slaves himself. Jack bulldog 2012 reinstated it based on one sentence in the Links in the Chain reference, which is not supported by its own references.

Whether Williams owned slaves remotely from England in his teens or not, this is not what he was known for, and need not be in the lead sentence of the article about his whole life. His father is described as owning slaves "with his sons", but Sir Edward was the sixth son, so it is more likely that his older brothers were the sons in question given that slave emancipation occurred in 1834. The reference to "Burton and his sons" appears to be [1] and says "four sons" in 1821 when Edward was only 8.

I would like to hear a reasoned argument that the lead should describe Williams as " an English-Australian lawyer, politician, judge and slaveholder." --Scott Davis ^Talk 12:56, 4 April 2019 (UTC) ( @Jack bulldog 2012: since I mis-typed the first time ) --Scott Davis ^Talk 12:58, 4 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

Agreed. It appears that Edward Willams was not a slaveholder, at 8, but very much part of a slaver family. He probably owned slaves but this is not evidence of it. User:Jack bulldog 2012 21:11, 4 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

That is why I removed "and slaveholder" from the lead sentence, but kept the description further down the article that talks about the family connection and compensation. I've added a location for the slaves for clarity too. --Scott Davis ^Talk 22:02, 4 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

Add topic