Talk:Edward Macnaghten, Baron Macnaghten

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Untitled edit

Edward Macnaghten was not responsible for the Macnaghten Rules of Insanity, but Daniel McNaughten was. See M'Naghten's_Case

If I get no further comments of this I will remove the "Insanity" line from the article.

Postnominal edit

Perhaps I have expressed myself badly. At Wikipedia, we don't use a postnominal for a baronetcy with peers, see Wikipedia:WikiProject Peerage#Content (under Notes). In all other cases it is of course written out in the intro. ~~ Phoe talk 18:32, 6 February 2007 (UTC) ~~ Reply

I have not yet looked at the guidelines but shall do. I understand while the prefix (Sir) is not used but see not reason why the post-nominal bart. shouldn't be. --Couter-revolutionary 18:45, 6 February 2007 (UTC)Reply
I don't know the specific reason, but one I see, is that many peers have a bundle of postnominals and therefore the not absolutely necessary ones are left out to avoid postnominal-monsters. And if we do not use it at some, then we should not use it also at everyone. If you want to know it exactly, you should ask perhaps on Wikipedia:WikiProject Peerage or Wikipedia:WikiProject Baronetcies. Greetings ~~ Phoe talk 19:51, 6 February 2007 (UTC) ~~ Reply
It's a slightly unhelpful answer but its one of those - that's just the way it is answers. There is no 'rule' it is simply convention that peers don't. I've seen a variety of reasons posited which are plausible enough. You can find any number of examples to backup the point pick a random monument to a famous baronet and peer like [1] Alci12 11:53, 7 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Edward Macnaghten, Baron Macnaghten. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:31, 20 December 2016 (UTC)Reply