Talk:Edo Porn

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the Japanese cinema task force.

Japan: Cinema Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Japan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Japan-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project, participate in relevant discussions, and see lists of open tasks. Current time in Japan: 08:38, May 24, 2024 (JST, Reiwa 6) (Refresh)JapanWikipedia:WikiProject JapanTemplate:WikiProject JapanJapan-related articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by the joint Japanese cinema task force.

WikiProject Japan to do list:

Peer review: Kako River (Japan)
A-class review: None

Featured content candidates –

Articles: None
Pictures: None
Lists: None

Good article nominations: Pure Japanese, Vinland Saga (TV series), Japanese destroyer Ume (1944), Mai Fujisawa, Godzilla Minus One
Add requested images to articles that need them.
Pages for Deletion: Participate in Japan-related deletion discussions.
Improve and expand Japan-related stubs.
Create some requested articles.
Help translate an article from the Japanese Wikipedia into English.
Assess unassessed articles

Plot edit

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Ok, I can see some issues here. The plot (as written at this time) seems to suggest that Tetsuzo hangs himself and then goes on to live until at least the age of 87. I have to admit this seems unlikely :) Robert Brockway (talk) 12:07, 4 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

"better known internationally with its exploitative title" edit

(Sigh) So, not only is this title better-known, but this is, even, internationally so. Sooooooo, ummm, just Where does Who get off, labeling this as "exploitative", oh dear, oh my? <Rant> "Ya push yer own private guilt-trip in! Ya pull their ethics out! Ya send a Woke Flare up As yer daily virtue-shout! Ya do the Wokey-Pokey and ya drag

 the whole rest of the World around 
   behind your precious as-if snowflakey 
     so-called sensibilities -

That's what it's all about!!! </Rant> No kidding, though: seeing as the article admits that this title is better-known, indeed internationally so, the arbitrary label of "exploitative" cannot stand.

Add topic