Talk:Edmond de la Fontaine

Latest comment: 7 years ago by TonyBallioni in topic Requested move 10 May 2017


Untitled

edit

I, Samuel Lentz, find this article just fasinating. --66.84.90.25 (talk) 22:07, 6 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

What.

edit

Somehow I do not believe "Dicks" is the most appropriate name for this article.

Especially since it's only two clicks from an article that 4chan just vandalised nto too long ago. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.190.9.254 (talk) 16:39, 19 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

Ikr Grim Reaper2798 (talk) 06:37, 31 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

Agree. Should be a disambiguation page. Morganfitzp (talk) 00:13, 21 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

Requested move 10 May 2017

edit
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved. Discussions about retargetting can take place outside of the RM process. (non-admin closure) TonyBallioni (talk) 03:06, 19 May 2017 (UTC)Reply


DicksEdmond de la Fontaine – This is clearly not the best name for the article. Having looked over the version history, the page was created in 2004 as a redirect to a fast food restaurant in Seattle. The redirect was replaced with the current subject in this version in 2007, and the article has been a subject of persistent vandalism ever since. Every corresponding article in every other language uses Edmond de la Fontaine, rather than his pen name (for instance: lb:Edmond de la Fontaine). I believe it is unusual to use a pen name as the title of an article for an author. It goes without saying that this move would put an end to the childish vandalism that often remains on the page for days before it is noticed (edit: I notice that the page has been protected, but I feel the rest still applies). L.R. Wormwood (talk) 12:12, 10 May 2017 (UTC)Reply


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.