Talk:Edgar Schoen

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Unbalanced edit

This page badly needs some balance. -- Hugh7 10:43, 4 May 2006 (UTC)Reply

In which direction?Zandrous 18:25, 29 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Edgar Schoen. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 14:42, 13 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

Article restructuring edit

I guess since there is somehow problems with my edit ill have to open this thread up. Why are you all reverting my edits still?Cirflow (talk) 04:31, 17 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

Views on lead poisoning edit

I am deleting the entire "Views on lead poisoning" section as an utter disaster, in terms of our policy on biographies of living persons. It starts with a claim that he is "widely criticized", without any source claiming so. It does have four examples of what I presume are claimed to be criticism of him, one of which is a WP:SPS, one of which is an unpublished BA thesis, and one of which only mentions him in an attributional footnote. There is a claim about the nature of his publications sourced to a resume that does not make that claim, and there is something held up as "exemplary" criticism with no source claiming that it is so. This is a poorly formulated attack section. There may be room for a piece of an article on his views on lead poisoning, but it should actually cover, you know, his views on lead poisoning. --Nat Gertler (talk) 01:57, 18 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Edgar Schoen. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:18, 29 November 2016 (UTC)Reply