| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Education
editIf "Eddie was kicked out of grade school, junior high, high school and college" how did he a.) get into college and b.) graduate college with honors? --69.205.121.0 00:12, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
Edit request from Lukechastain, 7 June 2011 - Broken website link
edit | This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
The link to Eddie Ifft's podcast website is broken. It's missing an 'e' in the URL. It should be jimandeddietalkshit.com
Lukechastain (talk) 16:27, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
Done Thanks - Happysailor (Talk) 21:11, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
Why are we revdelling the vandalism?
editFrom what I've heard, Ifft has asked his fans to go and edit Wikipedia to say he has AIDS. Technically WP:REVDEL says that it is covered by RD2 or RD3. But if someone has actively solicited the vandalism, it doesn't seem within the spirit of WP:REVDEL, Oversight or WP:BLP policies to revdel these. Ifft can hardly come back and say "hey, there's edits in my page history that say I have AIDS". Revdel needs to be applied pretty sparingly, and I think this may be going too far. Thoughts? —Tom Morris (talk) 10:43, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
- The revdel-ing makes sense to me. Regardless of whether Ifft was silly enough to actually request that people add damaging content to his article (which seems to be something i've heard from a lot of people, but not actually seen discussed in a RS), they are adding damaging, uncited, potentially defamatory, content to an article about a living person. I very much doubt there's an OTRS ticket wherein Ifft was like, "Oh hey, let people add this information that might screw up my life, I'm fine with it and swear I won't sue you." Which means us hosting defamatory content is still a problem, whether he thinks it's funny or not. A fluffernutter is a sandwich! (talk) 10:48, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
Edit request on 11 January 2012
edit| | This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Eddie Ifft has Aids.
162.95.159.25 (talk) 00:29, 11 January 2012 (UTC)
- Source?--Jac16888 Talk 00:44, 11 January 2012 (UTC)
- No he doesn't. Please don't disrupt Wikipedia to continue a prank a comedian is pulling upon himself. A fluffernutter is a sandwich! (talk) 01:15, 11 January 2012 (UTC)
Neutrality
editThe article has been edited for tone and I have removed the tag accordingly.--Soulparadox (talk) 14:23, 13 October 2012 (UTC)