This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
Latest comment: 4 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Hello. To whoever added this comment about a close tie to the subject, what are you referring to? I have read over 50 articles about this artist, Ed Massey, and have carefully cited and linked every fact shared. Please be more specific rather than adding a generalized assertion. Please read all 50 articles before tagging the page for lack of neutrality. There is no conflict of interest here.
The text has been reviewed and edited, again, for neutrality.
I have cut about 40% of the material you added. You cannot source items to the article subject, as the article subject is not a reliable source! The puffery and exaggeration in your version of the article is massive. I encourage you to read WP:RS and WP:FIVEPILLARS. We endeavour to be neutral, not to promote subjects with puffery. I have cut the aritcle down to a reasonably neutral form. ThatMontrealIP (talk) 02:22, 18 October 2019 (UTC)Reply