| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
This is a successful lawyer involved in many notable cases. He is also an expert in this field. The entry is well sourced with legitimate publications and was built using your article wizard. Please remove that tag as soon as possible. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mcnpa (talk • contribs)
- All that may be (and, heck, probably is) true -- but the problem with the article isn't referencing or notability -- it 's that the article reads like a cross between a promotional press release and a resume. Encyclopedia articles should be written from a neutral point of view. The tag I applied indicates that. Please consider rewriting the article neutrally, or it's likely to be deleted, regardless of notability or referencing. -- ArglebargleIV (talk) 20:07, 23 December 2009 (UTC)
I made a series of edits to remove items which may have contributed to the problems you noted. The rest of this entry should read neutrally, and again, as I mentioned, it's properly sourced by legitimate publications. Please remove the tag as soon as possible. Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mcnpa (talk • contribs) 20:48, 23 December 2009 (UTC)
Thanks! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mcnpa (talk • contribs) 22:33, 23 December 2009 (UTC)