The Auld review is a blog review by a non-notable economist without any editorial oversight. It makes claims, including about environmental issues, that the author has publicly refuted (https://futureofeverything.wordpress.com/2014/05/21/chris-auld/). So unlike the other reviews cited this does not qualify as a reliable source. At a minimum it shouldn't be inserted near the top of the review list as if it has equal credibility, so I have made that change. I also changed the web citation to the original version. The one given was a version with the same text, but with a large number of comments in response to the piece removed. Sjm3 (talk) 14:32, 20 May 2017 (UTC)