insects edit

are there ants? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.41.249.21 (talk) 00:59, 22 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

good sandbox articles with images edit

i found some sandbox pages of more or less inactive enwiki users:

the contents look valueable and there are some good images. maybe someone can make use of these pages? Holger1959 (talk) 22:42, 9 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Flora and fauna of Tasmania. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:29, 26 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Flora and fauna of Tasmania. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:08, 2 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

Flora section, second paragraph: "The Tarkine..." edit

I have a few problems with this paragraph, but particularly its prominent position as the second paragraph of the section, especially given the lack of reliable references and the use of nonsensical terms such as "Gondwanan rainforest" to describe extant vegetation.

In my opinion also the purpose of this part of the article should be to describe the flora of Tasmania in general terms, not its vegetation, which is summarised further down and also adequately described in articles such as Variation of Tasmanian vegetation from East to West and Alpine vegetation of Tasmania.

The paragraph smacks of having been placed here for political purposes, so if there is no objection I propose removing it altogether. MFdeS (talk) 01:11, 6 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

Given that there's no objection these past 2 weeks, I'll remove the section. MFdeS (talk) 01:01, 19 March 2019 (UTC)Reply