Eastern milk snake is part of WikiProject Amphibians and Reptiles, an effort to make Wikipedia a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource for amphibians and reptiles. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.Amphibians and ReptilesWikipedia:WikiProject Amphibians and ReptilesTemplate:WikiProject Amphibians and Reptilesamphibian and reptile articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is part of WikiProject Alabama, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Alabama on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page to join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlabamaWikipedia:WikiProject AlabamaTemplate:WikiProject AlabamaAlabama articles
Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The description I found in 1920 Americana for a "house snake or milk snake" seems to match the Peterson field guide for this variety. See Rines, George Edwin, ed. (1920). Encyclopedia Americana. {{cite encyclopedia}}: Missing or empty |title= (help) Both Peterson and Americana talk about 3 (Peterson mentions the possibility of 5) series of black-bordered brown (Peterson mention reddish-brown as a possibility) blotches on a gray (Peterson says it can also be tan) ground along the length of the snake. Banding has no part in the description. Also mentioned by both is a checkered underbelly (Peterson has a figure). That feature would be good to include. I think the current description of bands alternating with saddles is misleading. It is hard to imagine topologically. The "band" has to split to accommodate both the "saddles" and the lateral blotches. The latter are now not even mentioned. Possibly "saddle" is descriptive for the dorsal series of blotches, but "band" should be discarded altogether. Blotches seems more reasonable, though apparently the pattern varies and "saddle" can be very appropriate in some situations, as with the specimen photograph in the article. Bob Burkhardt (talk) 15:41, 3 April 2013 (UTC)Reply