Talk:Eastern indigo snake

Latest comment: 5 years ago by 107.12.3.127 in topic Missing Info

Missing Info edit

Though not its usual habitat, a 3-foot long specimen of this snake was found in Eastern NC on May 21, 2018. Pictures were taken and there was no mistaking the coloration. The snake was in a park that encompasses a large creek, though the snake was actually found near the restrooms and parking lot. The employees used a "pickup" device and gently moved him off into the woods. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 107.12.3.127 (talk) 23:53, 23 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

Even though I already know the answer, it would be nice if whether or not this snake is venomous, and more detail on how this snake hunts and kills its prey. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.181.108.45 (talk) 04:38, 18 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

It is ENDANGERED. This should be changed. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.143.126.144 (talk) 04:41, 26 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

We've got this source for LC. Please provide your source for the change. Materialscientist (talk) 04:43, 26 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

Re: state and federal protection as a threatened species, see Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission - http://myfwc.com/wildlifehabitats/profiles/reptiles-and-amphibians/reptiles/snakes/eastern-indigo-snake/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.232.127.82 (talk) 03:52, 8 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

--This is a better link from Florida Fish & Wildlife: [1] --Brad Patrick (talk) 17:25, 28 March 2013 (UTC)Reply


What about some Eastern Indigo owners who say the snake is very personable and can bond with the owner. I am facinated in this behavior with a reptile and would like to know more. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.98.198.108 (talk) 03:51, 10 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

Protected? edit

I was referred here from the Burmese Python article which claims the Indigo Snake is a federally protected species in the US, but this article has identified the Eastern Indigo snake as a species of "least concern".

Please clarify. -- EDIT: I see this edit has probably been misplaced above the original article and for this I apologize. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Axatax (talkcontribs) 06:58, 14 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

Sorry, I can not locate that claim in Burmese Python. The LC status is by the IUCN, not by US authorities; the population is declining, which might be a reason for federal protection. This link, for example, says they are "state and federally protected as a threatened species", yet "Eastern indigo snakes can be found in almost any habitat in Florida"; thus I figure the protection is preemptive and does not reflect the current population. Materialscientist (talk) 07:12, 14 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

Endangered Species? edit

What is the real deal here? Many other web sources

(http://webhome.broward.edu/~ssimpson/IndigoSnake.htm, http://www.enature.com/fieldguides/detail.asp?recNum=AR0095 http://www.wildflorida.com/wildlife/snakes/Eastern_Indigo_Snake.php http://www.eswr.com/tag/eastern-indigo-snake/)

Claim the Eastern Indigo Snake is an endangered species in the US, but is listed as LC in this article? This is very confusing. It may be a common snake in S. America, but not necessarily true for NA. Is the United Nations really considered the definitive source for this article? Maybe there should be some delineation between the conservation station between NA/SA varieties of this reptile.

75.251.185.17 (talk) 05:47, 23 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia is wp:WORLDWIDE, hence the use of IUCN sourcing. The IUCN listing is clear that it takes into account the wide range of the species. Still, there's no reason I can see that the article could not also indicate the US "threatened" status since 1978 under their Endangered Species Act. LeadSongDog come howl! 13:25, 31 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

Article is confusing edit

This article is confusing WRT to the "conservation" status. Is this snake endangered or protected or neither?? Every other source I could find concerning this snake classifies this animal as an endangered species. WP is seemingly the single source for LC classification. 75.225.168.167 (talk) 08:09, 31 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

As indicated, the source is the IUCN Red List. More specifically, see

Hammerson, G.A. (2007). "Drymarchon couperi". IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. IUCN. Retrieved 31 July 2012. LeadSongDog come howl! 12:40, 31 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Eastern indigo snake. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:57, 16 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Eastern indigo snake. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:03, 20 December 2017 (UTC)Reply