Talk:East Knoyle War Memorial/GA1

Latest comment: 4 years ago by Usernameunique in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: The Rambling Man (talk · contribs) 13:16, 6 April 2020 (UTC)Reply


Comments

  • Lead is a little brief for an article of this size, there's nothing about the design for example. My rule of thumb is cover the most pertinent part of each major section in brief in the lead.
  • Added a second paragraph, how does it look now?
  • "listed building.[1][2]" this, presumably, is referenced in the article so need for the citations in the lead.
  • Removed. That was a holdover from when the article was a stub, which I forgot to update.
  • "by 1918, the village had only 650 residents" why? Not dead, but serving still? Or something else?
  • Ah I see. I think this sentence would be better off in the next para after you explain the reasons for the decline.
  • Done.
  • "For Soldiers from East Knoyle killed in war" why the capital S?
  • Changed. I initially capitalized "soldiers" since it is the first word in the infobox template ("commemorates = Soldiers from East Knoyle killed in war"), without noticing the resulting error.
  • "had cut his teeth" not encyclopedic in tone.
  • Changed ("Maryon had established himself")
  • " University of Reading likewise tapped him" overlinked, and "tapped him" again doesn't feel encyclopedic in tone.
  • Removed link, and changed word ("likewise commissioned him").
  • "plinth sits, and a thin, tapering shaft that rises 16 feet (4.9 m) from the plinth" quick repeat of plinth.
  • Reworded: "It comprises a three-stepped square base set beneath a square plinth, from which a thin, tapering shaft rises 16 feet (4.9 m) and terminates in a small wheel cross."
  • St Mary's Church is overlinked.
  • Fixed.
  • ""East Knoyle - Cross"" en-dash.
  • Sure.
  • National Heritage List for England is overlinked.
  • Those links come automatically with the NHLE citation template.
  • "9, 557" is that 9,557 or something else? Likewise 10, 338.

That's it for a first pass. Nothing major, so on hold for the moment. Cheers. The Rambling Man (Staying alive since 2005!) 14:32, 6 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

  • Thanks for the heads up, The Rambling Man—indeed, I forgot to watch this page. The bible verse is covered by the line in "Design" that "John 15:13 is inscribed to its left". Do you think we need to clarify that John 15:13 is a bible verse? I've also added a footnote after the "at least 20" which explains the discrepancy; how does it look?
No need at all to apologize for "being a pain"; I intend on bringing this to FAC after here, so the attention to detail is particularly appreciated. --Usernameunique (talk) 21:00, 7 April 2020 (UTC)Reply
Usernameunique looks good (and sorry for the John oversight, my bad). I'll promote now as this is easily GA quality. Let me know if you have anything else in the pipeline that needs review. Cheers. The Rambling Man (Stay indoors, stay safe!!!!) 21:05, 7 April 2020 (UTC)Reply
Thanks again, The Rambling Man. Much appreciated as always. As I mentioned, Benty Grange hanging bowl is on its way to a nomination in the next week or so; I may also try to tidy John Richard Clark Hall and nominate it, given that it is about as complete as the sources will allow --Usernameunique (talk) 21:20, 7 April 2020 (UTC)Reply