Talk:Early life of Pedro II of Brazil/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

User Lecen had a lot of courage to create an article focusing on a particular aspect of a person – it is not very common, specially for Brazilian personalities. But he was very competent and created a long article, with relevant information, images and references. Almost everything that is worth to be read about Peter II childhood is there.

Apart from some red links, I think this must be a nominated article.

Reviewer: Tonyjeff (talk) 18:31, 28 February 2010 (UTC)

Note left by Pyrotec

This appears to be another "drive-by" review as per Talk:Honório Carneiro Leão, Marquis of Paraná/GA1 and, possibly, Talk:Afonso, Prince Imperial of Brazil/GA1. As with Afonso, Prince Imperial of Brazil message left on "reviewer's talkpage to find out status of review. Pyrotec (talk) 15:50, 3 April 2010 (UTC)

Overall summary

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

---

A comprehensive article and, I suspect, a possible WP:FAC candidate.

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   B. MoS compliance:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   Well referenced.

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   Well referenced.

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   Well illustrated.

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

   Well illustrated.

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

I'm awarding this article GA-status. I think it has potential at WP:FAC, its your decision but if you do decide to try, put it through WP:PR first. Congratulations on the quality of the article. Pyrotec (talk) 09:06, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

Thank you Pyrotec for taking the time to review and make some corrections to the article! • Astynax ^talk 09:31, 4 April 2010 (UTC)