Former good articleEVA Air was one of the Engineering and technology good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
November 5, 2007Good article nomineeNot listed
September 22, 2008Good article nomineeListed
January 22, 2024Good article reassessmentDelisted
Current status: Delisted good article

Pronunciation

edit

"(pronounced "E-V-A Air(ways)" <-- Does this match others' experience? I've certainly heard EVA pronounced as one word and not the letters, though I've only flown it twice and don't speak Chinese. Thomas Craven (talk) 18:23, 15 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

My entire life in both Canada and Thailand, it is always pronounced EVA (ee-va) Air - one word. 198.103.104.11 (talk) 03:45, 27 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

It is popularly called "Eva Air" but the official pronunciation is "E-V-A" as shown in these official videos from the carrier: [1] (at 0:32), and here [2] (at 0:42). Regards, SynergyStar (talk) 07:30, 27 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion

edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 10:30, 11 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Commons files used on this page have been nominated for speedy deletion

edit

The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page have been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reasons for deletion at the file description pages linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 09:21, 20 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

Why did they retire the 747 from their fleet?

edit

I really miss the 747 being Eva airs fleet. Why did they retire it? 66.215.202.57 (talk) 19:42, 29 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

GA Reassessment

edit

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · WatchWatch article reassessment pageMost recent review
Result: Delisted. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 14:14, 22 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

This 2008 listing has not been adequately updated since its promotion, and as a result, there is significant uncited material throughout the article.

There is also an advertisement tag in the "Services" section, and the "History" section is very biased towards the airline's earlier years. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 17:09, 13 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Archived ref not used in the article

edit

Sunnya343 (talk) 21:30, 27 March 2024 (UTC)Reply