This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
This article was accepted on 10 January 2012 by reviewer Sionk (talk·contribs).
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
This article is so full of jargon, buzzwords and opinion that it is almost unintelligible. Can someone who understands architecture please do a rewrite? —Anne Delong (talk) 02:06, 21 March 2014 (UTC)Reply
Yes, I'm an architecture graduate and I tend to agree with you. It may be partly a translation problem and partly a copy-paste issue by someone who doesn't understand the jargon either :) I've simply removed "In the design process, E2A focuses on the interdisciplinary process that synthesizes analytic reaction to context as well as a hypothetical and programmatic approaches to interpret the contemporary condition", because it is basically what all good architecture practices should be doing i.e. analyse the situation to come up with a theoretical and practical solution. Sionk (talk) 14:10, 21 March 2014 (UTC)Reply
