Talk:E. W. Hobson

Untitled

Concerning

It included material on general topology and Fourier series ... and included mistakes that were picked up later (for example by R. L. Moore),

I should like to suggest that the latter part of this statement be appropriately documented, or removed altogether; as it stands, it has all the appearance of a libellous statement, and, further, a general reader has no way of verifying this remark which is unfair to Hobson at the very least. To clarify this, firstly, Hobson's book, published in 1907, deals with what one might call front-line mathematics of its time and insofar as I can judge, he is very careful in pointing out which issues are accepted and which controversial; it is inappropriate to allege, hundred years since, that the book contained errors; secondly, the book in question knows later editions: in 1921 and 1926, the second edition of this book was published as Volume I and Volume II respectively (the first edition of 1907 was in one volume); the third edition of Volume I, published in 1927, is Revised throughout and enlarged (Hobson died in 1933). Cambridge University Press reprinted both volumes in 1950 (Dover followed in 1957, at least insofar as Volume II is concerned). It is relevant to mention that the first edition of the book counts 772 pages, whereas Volume I, 3rd edition, counts 732 pages and Volume II, 2nd edition, counts 783 pages.

Incidentally, insofar as general topology is concerned, Hobson solely deals with the Heine-Borel theorem; there is not much topology, as we understand the term today, in the book (one will search in vain in the book for the word topology).

--BF 13:50, 7 December 2006 (UTC)

Srinivasa Ramanujan

Hobson was one of the three mathematicians to whom Srinivasa Ramanujan wrote a letter. Hobson returned the letter without comment. I think this should be mentioned in the article.

118.210.107.10 (talk) 10:08, 19 November 2012 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on E. W. Hobson. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101018061028/http://www.lms.ac.uk/newsletter/323/323_11.html to http://www.lms.ac.uk/newsletter/323/323_11.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:31, 21 December 2017 (UTC)

MacTutor copyright

I got a message saying that edits I made with information from MacTutor was copyrighted. Here's a link to MacTutor showing that information from it is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License: https://mathshistory.st-andrews.ac.uk/Miscellaneous/copyright/ AWZhbg (talk) 09:08, 8 July 2022 (UTC)

Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International is not a compatible license, according to the WMF legal team. Please see WP:COMPLIC for a list of compatible licenses. — Diannaa (talk) 12:13, 8 July 2022 (UTC)