Talk:E-Flexer-class ferry

Proposed merge of Stena Estrid into E-Flexer-class ferry

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

To not merge given uncontested WP:SHIPOUTCOMES arguments. Klbrain (talk) 17:29, 16 May 2021 (UTC)

---

Rather than have articles on each individual ship within the class, they could be gathered into the class article, with redirects from each name. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:25, 25 November 2020 (UTC) DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:25, 25 November 2020 (UTC)

I’m not sure why this should happen given even direct sister-ships have individual pages on Wikipedia. A single page for 9 (to-date) ships could also get very messy, particularly accounting for all the changes made to the design “Cote d’Opale” which is a very different ship to any of the others, not to mention when each of the nine ships moves on to other things than their initial routes. Of the nine ships ordered to date, there are six different designs. Stena are on record saying there are other possible variations as well, including a shortened version. Tarbyonline (talk) 18:00, 25 November 2020 (UTC)

Oppose Ships this size are likely to be individually notable under WP:SHIPOUTCOMES Lyndaship (talk) 18:43, 10 January 2021 (UTC)

Oppose - MS Stena Estrid fulfils WP:GNG, and is assumed to warrant its own article. EP111 (talk) 04:29, 27 February 2021 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.