Talk:Dzongkha numerals

Expert tag

Sorry, I didn't see you were continuing to edit. I just saw the empty decimal section and tagged it.. Shaad lko (talk) 09:30, 26 June 2011 (UTC)

No problem. — kwami (talk) 13:44, 26 June 2011 (UTC)

Correction needed?

The number system shown is not Duodecimal, it's either Decimal or Vigesimal. Johndawson45 (talk) 10:15, 31 August 2011 (UTC)

The numerals in the table are all decimal, in both the Arabic and the Dzongka columns. There are no single-digit symbols for the numbers ten through nineteen. 2601:441:4400:1740:B4C5:5235:F86B:5A37 (talk) 23:51, 24 February 2022 (UTC)

Blacklisted Links Found on the Main Page

Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia. This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link. If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting. If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page. If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request its removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true. Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.

Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:

• http://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/docs/00/16/68/91/PDF/numerationTB_SLP.pdf

  Triggered by \bhalshs\.archives-ouvertes\.fr on the global blacklist

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot II ^Notify_Online 15:23, 27 March 2014 (UTC)

 Resolved This issue has been resolved, and I have therefore removed the tag, if not already done. No further action is necessary.—cyberbot II ^Notify_Online 07:28, 29 March 2014 (UTC)

Misprint? Aren't those quasi-Spanish numerals?

Pardon me if I'm mistaken, but aren't those Dzongkha numerals a transliteration of Spanish? Is it a joke?

The numerals listed for Dzongkha here are totally different:

https://books.google.com/books?id=ZoEtDgAAQBAJ&lpg=PA133&ots=hjaqqPyzhB&dq=dzongkha%20numerals&pg=PA134#v=onepage&q=dzongkha%20numerals&f=false http://wikitravel.org/en/Dzongkha_phrasebook

Yes, most of this page is completely incorrect. The romanisation for numbers 1-20 are decidedly Malayo-Polynesian; a Google search shows that 1-10 are Bikol. 11-20 seem to be incorrect even in that language. For higher numbers, this explains that. Jaml0 (talk) 02:57, 13 April 2017 (UTC)

Pinging @Kwamikagami:. Thought you should see this. Doug Weller talk 13:11, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

I reverted the article to when it had all numbers 1–20. Sorry about the loss of Dzongkha script; someone please restore it. I don't have much time online today. — kwami (talk) 02:14, 12 May 2017 (UTC)