Talk:Dyson's transform
Latest comment: 5 years ago by 2001:4643:E6E3:0:B99A:4E6A:45C0:A343 in topic Please write understandable
 | This page was proposed for deletion by Arthur Rubin (talk · contribs) on 13 March 2009 with the comment: Accurate, but gives neither a real source, nor evidence of notability. It was contested by Uncia (talk · contribs) on 2009-03-13 with the comment: article improved to address nominator's concerns |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Please write understandable edit
The modern life give us very little possibilities to use precious time to interpret. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:4643:E6E3:0:B99A:4E6A:45C0:A343 (talk) 22:10, 7 January 2019 (UTC)
Dyson's transform edit
This article never gets around to saying what "Dyson's transform" is. It's also badly written in several other respects:
- It may be confusing the singleton of a set with the set itself;
- It has no proper initial context-setting;
- Some notation style issues.
Michael Hardy (talk) 16:38, 12 March 2009 (UTC)