Talk:Dutch invasion of Saint Helena
Latest comment: 2 years ago by Zawed in topic GA Review
Dutch invasion of Saint Helena has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: February 8, 2022. (Reviewed version). |
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Dutch invasion of Saint Helena article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
A fact from Dutch invasion of Saint Helena appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 15 December 2021 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
Did you know nomination edit
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Theleekycauldron (talk) 21:52, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
( )
- ... that the first landing during the Dutch invasion of Saint Helena was defeated by English settlers throwing rocks? "Four ships left the Cape at the end of 1672 under the leadership of Jacob de Gens, who tried to penetrate the island via a steep ravine known as Lemon Valley, but his men were driven back by English planters who bombarded them with rocks from above." from: "'Invaders' to St Helena come bearing curiosity". Cape Argus. Gale OneFile. 2 November 2017.
- Reviewed: First of two credits from Template:Did you know nominations/Michaela Goade, We Are Water Protectors
Moved to mainspace by Dumelow (talk). Self-nominated at 10:44, 29 November 2021 (UTC).
- New article that was moved to mainspace on 29 November 2021 is 5,617 characters and nominated on the same day. No copyvios detected and duplication detector of online sources[1][2] reveal no close paraphrasing issues (AGF sources which can't go through Dup detector). Article is well-sourced. Hook is 113 characters long (under 200 character max.) and is interesting. Ref 4 (verifying the hook) is a reliable source (AGF as there is no preview available). QPQ done. Looks good to go! —Bloom6132 (talk) 11:22, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
GA Review edit
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Dutch invasion of Saint Helena/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Zawed (talk · contribs) 03:20, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
I'll take this one. Comments as follows:
Lead edit
- No obvious issues identified but wonder if Anthony Beale worth a redlink
Background edit
- the settlement at Cape Town in Southern Africa.[2][1] : if it's your preference, I note the refs are not in chronological order here. Actually, just noticed, these refs are redundant anyway as they are used again for the following sentence. I would just cite the entire paragraph to [1] and [2] at the end.
- established a settlement and fort.: perhaps namedrop Jamestown here (I assume that is the settlement referred to).
Dutch invasion edit
- Is there an appropriate link for the Dutch navy?
- Linked to Royal Netherlands Navy - Dumelow (talk) 08:04, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
- Would Jacob de Gens be worth a redlink? Ditto Anthony Beale.
- I suspect it is not available, hence its absence, but anything on the size of the attacking forces/garrison at Jamestown?
- which they renamed Good Fortune.: is the original name of the fort known?
- It looks like, apart from the first sentence, the entire paragraph could just be cited at the end with [3] and [4].
Recapture by English forces edit
- Link sloop, Royal Navy
- Add 4 May somewhere into the narrative; I assume that was the date the expedition arrived at Fisher's Valley.
- The second paragraph could be entirely cited to [3] and [5] at its end.
Aftermath edit
- and, later in 1673,: is this year correct? If so, suggest rewording to the effect of "later that year" or similar.
Other stuff edit
- No dupe links
- Image tags checked and OK