This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Golf, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Golf-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GolfWikipedia:WikiProject GolfTemplate:WikiProject GolfGolf articles
Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
With the recent announcement that Johnson released about the break he is taking for personal reasons, considering the circumstances surrounding it, it's the kind of thing that may encourage vandals to stop by this article and do the things they do. Just in case they do, editors are encouraged to put this article in their watchlist to keep an eye out for any unwanted activity by potential vandals. Hopefully they will leave the article alone. Johnsmith2116 (talk) 22:08, 31 July 2014 (UTC)Reply
Vandals? Unwanted activity? Care to define what you mean? Does this extend to things that are documented in media articles or are you just forbidding any negative commentary? There is an article in The Telegraph that clarifies what is meant by the euphimism "personal reasons" and notes his failed drug tests and rumoured extramarital affairs. Are you suggesting you would block any mention of this? Tigerman2005 (talk) 03:31, 13 November 2014 (UTC)Reply
