Talk:Dusky crag martin

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified
Good articleDusky crag martin has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Featured topic starDusky crag martin is part of the Crag martins series, a featured topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
April 13, 2010Good article nomineeListed
July 8, 2010Featured topic candidatePromoted
Current status: Good article

GA Review edit

This review is transcluded from Talk:Dusky Crag Martin/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: S Masters (talk) 14:11, 13 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS):  
    Article is well wriiten and complies with WP:MoS.
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
    All references appear to be in order.
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
    Article covers major aspects and is focused on its subject.
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
    Article complies to WP:NPOV.
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
    Article appears stable.
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
    All images comply with requirements.
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  

Summary: Everything is in order and I am satisfied that the article complies to all the requirements for a Good Article. As such, I am pleased to pass this article for GA status.

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Dusky crag martin. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:00, 18 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Dusky crag martin. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:02, 15 September 2017 (UTC)Reply