Talk:Duranta erecta
Latest comment: 5 years ago by 2001:44B8:2100:5800:5D77:B10E:4EB6:CE23 in topic moved
 | A fact from Duranta erecta appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 14 December 2008, and was viewed approximately 1,287 times (disclaimer) (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
moved edit
this belongs at D. repens not erecta, could someone please change the article to suit its new place? (i.e. change all instances of erecta to repens).
Mod MMG (User Page) Reply on my talkpage. Do NOT click this link 04:30, 3 July 2010 (UTC)
- I don't get it. Duranta Erecta and D. repens are two different species. D. erecta is an invasive species in Australia and elsewhere, as mentioned in the article and D. repens is not. Why do you want to move it? --2001:44B8:2100:5800:5D77:B10E:4EB6:CE23 (talk) 12:24, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
Something's wrong edit
The first image with flowers in the infobox (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Duranta_erecta.jpg) has differently-shaped leaves than the other pictures. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:44B8:2100:5800:5D77:B10E:4EB6:CE23 (talk) 12:18, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
