Talk:Dunoon/Archives/2024 1

This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Proposed removal of "Other buildings"

Latest comment: 4 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

A fire is a news story. The fire damaged buildings have been demolished. No longer relevant? 2A00:23C6:CE0F:6D01:B100:664C:B892:D45 (talk) 16:58, 5 February 2024 (UTC)

Proposed reorder of section headings?

Latest comment: 4 months ago3 comments3 people in discussion

Suggested

History
Geography
Culture
Transport
Sport and recreation
Education
Religion
Media
Notable People
Climate
Government and politics
Gallery
See Also
References
External links

2A00:23C6:CE0F:6D01:B100:664C:B892:D45 (talk) 17:17, 5 February 2024 (UTC)

Agree geography should move up a bit (but not above history!) but otherwise the existing order looks OK.---Ehrenkater (talk) 21:09, 5 February 2024 (UTC)

Moved Geography on list. 2A00:23C6:CE0F:6D01:10C5:B416:36C2:ACCB (talk) 21:19, 5 February 2024 (UTC)

Dunoon Free Church (built 1843), (Moved to closed list)

Latest comment: 4 months ago3 comments1 person in discussion

This building has been for sale for awhile. Should it be moved to "Closed/demolished religious buildings? Does this church still have a congregation, but meets elswhere? 2A00:23C6:CE0F:6D01:B100:664C:B892:D45 (talk) 17:49, 5 February 2024 (UTC)

The church's Facebook page says it closed in February 2021! I know unreliable source. https://www.facebook.com/278094949681480/posts/dunoon-free-church-argyll-street-now-sadly-closed-during-the-1980s-greenock-and-/871139160377053/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A00:23C6:CE0F:6D01:B100:664C:B892:D45 (talk) 18:24, 5 February 2024 (UTC)

I think I will take this in good faith and move the church to closed list. 2A00:23C6:CE0F:6D01:B100:664C:B892:D45 (talk) 18:27, 5 February 2024 (UTC)

I am not getting involved with editing wars!

Latest comment: 4 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

One editor seems very sensitive and a law unto themselves. Looking at their talk page, has numerous issues about their actions.

They revert many edits straight away, with NO discussion that they do NOT agree with. I thought Wikipedia was editable by anyone in good faith and by a consensus if questioned?

This editor in my experience removes most mentions/links etc of "Cowal" and has done for years.

I am done!

Goodbye. 2A00:23C6:CE0F:6D01:10C5:B416:36C2:ACCB (talk) 22:38, 5 February 2024 (UTC)