Talk:Dunnhumby

Latest comment: 5 years ago by Nataliedunnhumby in topic Additions from dunnhumby

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. Community Tech bot (talk) 15:21, 12 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

Additions from dunnhumby edit

Hi, my name is Natalie and I work in the Communications team at dunnhumby. I’m new to Wikipedia, but understand and respect the rules of maintaining NPOV and making sure that items posted are verifiable and not original research.
Additionally, I recognize that since I work for dunnhumby I have a clear conflict of interest and will utilize the talk pages to discuss comments regarding the page.
My aim for participating is not to transform the article into a glowing review, but to transparently assist with any information requests or address factual clarifications that might help continue to evolve the article so that it provides a thorough overview of the company that reflects general consensus.
With that in mind, I have followed the gradual evolution of this page and noticed a few points that I wanted to suggest that might help as the page continues to develop:
Consider making the following updates to the Current business section

  • Bulleted list item

Update BzzAgent paragraph to reflect sale to PowerReviews [1]

  • Bulleted list item

Include information about our acquisition of Aptaris [2]

  • Bulleted list item

Details about our partnership with JDA software [3]

  • Bulleted list item

Information about our Joint Venture with China Resources Vanguard [4] Nataliedunnhumby (talk) 14:26, 14 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

References

Additions from dunnhumby edit

My name is Natalie and I work in the Communications team at dunnhumby. Last month I posted a comment regarding some points to improve the accuracy of the company information. Since we haven’t heard anything back from the community I’m planning on making the previously suggested updates in the next few days. I recognize that because I work for dunnhumby I have a clear conflict of interest, but since the suggested updates reflect similar items posted in articles of other similar companies, we believe these are appropriate additions to the article. I understand that this might be changed by various editors and that is why I have attempted to include language that maintains NPOV and is verifiable online. My aim for these updates is not to make this article a glowing review of the company, but to make sure it includes some basic background information that reflects general consensus. Nataliedunnhumby (talk) 11:16, 3 January 2019 (UTC)Reply