| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Dunhuang manuscripts article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on June 25, 2013. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=small}
.svg){kind=small}
Mistake edit
This statement is false:
The Samten Migdron was recovered amongst the Dunhuang texts.
This is nowhere stated in the book cited as an authority.
In fact, this text was preserved in manuscript transmissions over a period of over a thousand years. This error really must be rectified, since I see it being repeated all over the web. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 132.64.40.243 (talk) 17:24, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
I agree with the above - there are some Dzogchen texts among the Dunhuang manuscripts, but the text mentioned is not one of them. I also suggest that sections 1.3 and 1.4 should not be placed under 'Classification' at all. 1.4 should be merged with 1.3, and this discussion should be in a separate section which also discusses the manuscripts in other languages, not only Tibetan.
Samvs (talk) 10:26, 12 September 2012 (UTC)
External links modified edit
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Dunhuang manuscripts. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120414223151/http://www.toyo-bunko.or.jp/newresearch/upload/2010011510422259.pdf to http://www.toyo-bunko.or.jp/newresearch/upload/2010011510422259.pdf
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120414223151/http://www.toyo-bunko.or.jp/newresearch/upload/2010011510422259.pdf to http://www.toyo-bunko.or.jp/newresearch/upload/2010011510422259.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:11, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
Hebrew edit
There is a list of languages cited in the lead that is uncited in the body, while Hebrew is cited in the body but was recently removed from the lead. This should be rectified. 216.208.65.229 (talk) 22:03, 14 September 2020 (UTC)