![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
"Western"
editUkrainianSavior1,
if you don't wish to link Western Ukraine on the whole, ok, but the other concern still holds, so until we don't agree in an appropriate rephrasing, it will be reset as it was.(KIENGIR (talk) 11:23, 7 December 2019 (UTC))
It doesn't make sense to link it because the Western Ukraine article mostly discusses West Ukraine in the political context, not historical. This is why linking it to just Ukraine, which has a greater focus on Ukraine's history, will make the connection hold more water.
The rephrasing also makes sense due to it being more efficient without taking away the meaning of the phrase. It saves space, and allows for more information to be added. — Preceding unsigned comment added by UkrainianSavior1 (talk • contribs) 05:52, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
- Excuse me, but your recent change is even worse, because we cannot confuse the present situation with what was then, similarly with your previous changes, and the meaning of the sentence is not lost, on the contrary. I offered you several rephrasing that would satisfy the case, unless you don't pick one or you don't propose another acceptable here, it remains what was before.(KIENGIR (talk) 04:20, 10 December 2019 (UTC))