 | A fact from Duke of Chicago appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 25 July 2011 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
Why [sic]? edit
The article quotes a movie review as follows: "'slow-paced and seemingly a lot longer than its [sic] fifty-nine minutes.'" Why the "[sic]"? The quotation correctly uses "its" (possessive pronoun) instead of "it's" (contraction of "it is") and otherwise appears to be grammatically correct? -- Bob (Bob99 (talk) 15:34, 25 July 2011 (UTC))
Not a short film edit
Before I removed it, this was described in the intro as "a 61-minute short film", which is both a contradiction in terms and inaccurate regarding this film. It is unambiguously a feature film. Features of an hour (or even a little shorter) were not at all uncommon in Ye Olde Hollywood. By no reasonable or accepted definition is a 61-minute film a short as opposed to a feature. Soulnus (talk) 06:59, 21 September 2020 (UTC)