Talk:Duice

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Untitled edit

Why does 69 Boyz get credit for Dazzey Duks? Duice produced Dazzey Duks and even released an album with the same name in 1995. Often called Daisy Dukes and credited to 69 Boyz, the Dazzey Duks song is listed multiple times under the wrong name and group. No album by the 69 Boyz or single for that matter has been released by the 69 Boyz with this song with any reference to Daisy Dukes. If someone could find Definitive proof the 69 Boyz released any Daisy Dukes song. Go for it.

http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B0000000F7/sr=8-1/qid=1149535301/ref=pd_bbs_1/002-2510860-5828047?%5Fencoding=UTF8

http://www.google.com/musicl?lid=vCL95efPR0J

Huh? What makes you think anyone thinks Dazzey Duks was by the 69 Boyz? According to my Billboard book Dazzey Duks is by Duice (their only hit) and the singles on the Hot 100 by 69 Boys were Tootsee Roll, Kitty Kitty, Hoop N Yo Face, Woof Woof, and How We Roll. I never heard anyone confuse them. --Darkdan 21:12, 5 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Duice. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:33, 17 December 2016 (UTC)Reply