Talk:Duckfat

Latest comment: 10 months ago by Generaluser11 in topic External links modified

Notability

edit

Hello, I tagged this article because I don't think it meets the critera for WP:CORP, which go beyond just having a few sources. I will explain why:

  • Depth of coverage - One published recipe on oprah.com. Not discussion, no coverage of the restaurant, and it looks submitted by the restaurant themselves. One directory style listing, and a link to a couple of reviews. So yes, it obviously exists, it has been mentioned, but there is no depth to the coverage at all, and nothing outside the routine articles you would expect for any restaurant.
  • Audience/Independence of Sources - I don't think these even come into it given the lack of coverage, but there is no significant coverage either locally, nationally, or internationally, and hence no reason to look at independence.

Therefore, given the lack of coverage, it looks like it fails [{WP:CORP]] to me. Do you have any other sources which could help with this? Cheers Heywoodg talk 07:25, 3 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Duckfat. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:16, 17 December 2016 (UTC)Reply


Remove this, what does this have to do with anything? Every city in America has sandwiches Generaluser11 (talk) 19:49, 15 December 2023 (UTC)Reply