This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Poland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Poland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PolandWikipedia:WikiProject PolandTemplate:WikiProject PolandPoland articles
Latest comment: 2 years ago6 comments2 people in discussion
Since the 14th century the duchy was outside of Poland, so why does it got a Polish title here instead of the German Ratibor? It's even the latest name und this is how the Dukes call themself. --Jonny84 (talk) 03:01, 28 February 2022 (UTC)Reply
Because the duchy was still under the Polish Silesian Piasts rule even though it was outside of the Kingdom of Poland, later it passed over to the Czech Přemyslids of Bohemia and subsequently dissolved. --E-960 (talk) 18:50, 1 March 2022 (UTC)Reply
Still no evidence for the use of the name "Racibórz". --Jonny84 (talk) 18:57, 1 March 2022 (UTC)Reply
Weil viele (ober-)schlesische Untertanen kein Deutsch konnten, wurde nach der Annexion durch das Königreich Preußen die neue Steuerverordnung Friedrichs II. umgehend ins Polnische übersetzt. Interessant sind die Ortsnamen.
Pls note this interesting image, because the list has "Raciborz", so the Polish inhabitants called it Raciborz, which would include the original Polish Silesian Piast rulers. --E-960 (talk) 19:14, 1 March 2022 (UTC)Reply
This is a Polish translation made by a (private) printing office from Breslau. Nothing official. So what does it validate? The original was in German. I know the original books.. This is one of the examples of faking history.. --Jonny84 (talk) 19:23, 1 March 2022 (UTC)Reply
Where did you get your information, please provide a source for your claim about this document. --E-960 (talk) 19:31, 1 March 2022 (UTC)Reply
