Talk:Duchy (Kingdom of Hungary)

Latest comment: 6 years ago by Borsoka in topic Hungarian version

[Untitled] edit

article has no references and tercia part regni is a latin rare name for a principality of nitra. so iam going to redirect it to the Principality fo Nitra — Preceding unsigned comment added by Samofi (talkcontribs) 08:45, 26 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

Principality of Nitra has nothing to do with Tercia Pars Regni. Fakirbakir (talk) 20:11, 26 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

It has to do, its the Nitra appanage duchy: http://books.google.com/books?id=3orG2yZ9mBkC&pg=PA278&dq=nitra+appanage+duchy&hl=sk&ei=f2GBTtnjNYTCswaL6sSRDg&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=1&ved=0CDQQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=nitra%20appanage%20duchy&f=false http://books.google.com/books?id=4Je2AAAAIAAJ&q=%22Nitra,+ako+jedno+zo+stred%C3%ADsk+rozpoltenej+Ve%C4%BEkej+Moravy+si+aj+v+ranouhorskom+%C5%A1t%C3%A1te+ponech%C3%A1va+funkciu+vojvodstva+(ducatus)+a+prezentuje+sa+ako+tertia+pars+regni.%22&dq=%22Nitra,+ako+jedno+zo+stred%C3%ADsk+rozpoltenej+Ve%C4%BEkej+Moravy+si+aj+v+ranouhorskom+%C5%A1t%C3%A1te+ponech%C3%A1va+funkciu+vojvodstva+(ducatus)+a+prezentuje+sa+ako+tertia+pars+regni.%22&hl=sk&ei=DWGBTt7bEIzesgbEtN2ODg&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=1&ved=0CDAQ6AEwAA: "Nitra, ako jedno zo stredísk rozpoltenej Veľkej Moravy si aj v ranouhorskom štáte ponecháva funkciu vojvodstva (ducatus) a prezentuje sa ako tertia pars regni." Nitra like a one from the centers of the Great Moravia has a function as a ducatus like a tertia pars regni. --Samofi (talk) 05:39, 27 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

It is just a theory, nothing else. You can write it down at page of Principality of Nitra. Please see the map, Bihar county and Temes county (for instance) were parts of the Dukátus. Fakirbakir (talk) 09:25, 27 September 2011 (UTC)Reply
maybe its theory but its sources. find a reliable english langue source. here next source about nitra ducatus: http://books.google.com/books?id=eUtOAAAAYAAJ&q=nyitra+ducatus&dq=nyitra+ducatus&hl=sk&ei=PZ6BTuCPGpGe-Qaw27HMDw&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=1&ved=0CC8Q6AEwAA and here is the hungarian source: http://books.google.com/books?id=jpuFAAAAIAAJ&q=%22Vazul,+G%C3%A9za,+L%C3%A1szl%C3%B3,+majd+%C3%81lmos+herceg+uralma+alatt+a+nyitrai+r%C3%A9szfejedelems%C3%A9g+a+XI.+sz%C3%A1zadban,+mint+tertia+pars+regni%22&dq=%22Vazul,+G%C3%A9za,+L%C3%A1szl%C3%B3,+majd+%C3%81lmos+herceg+uralma+alatt+a+nyitrai+r%C3%A9szfejedelems%C3%A9g+a+XI.+sz%C3%A1zadban,+mint+tertia+pars+regni%22&hl=sk&ei=EqCBTou5C4Oc-wbKurTGDw&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=1&ved=0CCwQ6AEwAA --Samofi (talk) 10:07, 27 September 2011 (UTC)Reply
You want to make a harsh connection between Principality of Nitra (805-833(~900)) and Tercia pars regni (1048-1163). This is just a 'hypothesis' about 'continuity' and nothing else. It would be very farfetched. Principality of Nitra existed independently in the first half of the 9th century. Tercia pars regni belongs to the theme of Kingdom of Hungary.Fakirbakir (talk) 13:24, 27 September 2011 (UTC)Reply
Here is another theory: According to György Györffy the origin of the Dukátus has roots to the pagan past. "A Dukátusnak van pogány múltba visszavezethető gyökere". [1]Fakirbakir (talk) 13:39, 27 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:Hungary 11th cent.png Nominated for Deletion edit

  An image used in this article, File:Hungary 11th cent.png, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests September 2011
What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 16:31, 29 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

Requested move edit

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Moved to Duchy (Kingdom of Hungary). EdJohnston (talk) 16:07, 5 September 2013 (UTC)Reply



DucatusDuchy (Hungary)Ducatus is a common noun meaning Duchy in Latin (see http://www.thefreedictionary.com/duchy). There were also other duchies in Europe: Ducatus Lithuaniae, Ducatus Romae, Ducatus Ultradunensis etc 79.117.139.133 (talk) 10:10, 27 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

Why "ducatus" instead of "duchy"? Shouldn't English be preferred? English sources use the name "duchy" [2] 79.117.143.87 (talk) 10:23, 27 August 2013 (UTC)Reply
Please read the sources cited to substantiate the present use of this title. Otherwise, Duchy (Hungary) would rather refer to noble families holding the title "duke" in Hungary. Borsoka (talk) 10:26, 27 August 2013 (UTC)Reply
A duchy does not define a family, but a territory, fief, or domain ruled by a duke or duchess. It is absurd to suggest that ducatus has a different meaning than duchy. Duchy (Kingdom of Hungary) is good too, if you insist to mention the form of government 79.117.143.87 (talk) 10:33, 27 August 2013 (UTC)Reply
Please read WP:NAME and read the sources, written in English, cited in the article. Borsoka (talk) 10:37, 27 August 2013 (UTC)Reply
Ok then. let's check your sources:
Other sources using the name duchy: [5] [6] [7] [8] 79.117.152.83 (talk) 11:03, 27 August 2013 (UTC)Reply
Thanks. You convinced me, even so I would suggest Duchy (Kingdom of Hungary). Borsoka (talk) 11:25, 27 August 2013 (UTC)Reply
Thank you too for understanding. We can also mention the Latin name in the first sentence. I agree with your proposal and, if you want, you can make the page move manually, and I will close this request then. Ducatus can become a redirect to duchy. 79.117.156.17 (talk) 11:42, 27 August 2013 (UTC)Reply
I suggest that we should wait some days (let's say 2 days), and then the movement can be made if there is no strong opposition. Borsoka (talk) 11:46, 27 August 2013 (UTC)Reply
  • Comment all these suggested names should become redirects to this article, if they are not chosen as the title of the article. -- 76.65.128.222 (talk) 03:43, 28 August 2013 (UTC)Reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Hungarian version edit

This should be merged with https://hu.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duk%C3%A1tus (problem is, I don't know how to). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A00:1080:809:200:71E6:2E43:7B68:8871 (talk) 12:45, 30 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

The two articles cannot be merged, but you can expand this article based on the Hungarian version. Borsoka (talk) 13:48, 30 August 2017 (UTC)Reply