Talk:Du You

Latest comment: 6 years ago by FourLights in topic Workspace

Workspace

edit

https://books.google.com/books?id=BZX7AQAAQBAJ&pg=PT326

In contrast with Lu Zhi, who had entered the bureaucracy through the examination and wanted to preserve the examination system on the basis of "fairness", Du did not consider the examination system as promoting capable people (a view shared by many). Du wanted senior officials to recommend capable people from among the excess of already-existing officials (as was done in the Han dynasty), whose offices Du wanted to eliminate to cut down on expenses. He believed that this would help to advance people of talent and virtue that were otherwise neglected; if the recommendation was false, the sponsor could be criminally charged. He paraphases Shang Yang on the need for changing with the times.

However, Lu still agreed that the recommendation system should have a part in placement, so that in reality both have a similar view on the role of the Imperium. Other reformers simply wanted to change the examination's subjects, the more prominent view.[1]

FourLights (talk) 15:30, 13 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

References

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Du You. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:17, 14 September 2017 (UTC)Reply