Talk:Dryton and Apollonia archive

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

  1. This article should be organized into sections and should more closely follow Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style. - JNB 21:58, 11 May 2007 (UTC)Reply
  2. As noted by some people not in RomanCiv, the importance of the subject needs to be clarified.
    1. Why do we care about Dryton?
    2. What do the articles reveal?
  3. Links to other Wikipedia entries must be included (it also makes less work for you because some information can be found on the links and need not be repeated).
  4. The article should be better organized and sections should be given titles
  5. Sources:
    1. Don't we need 3?
    2. Primary source?

JNB 22:28, 15 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

  1. This article needs to be properly formatted and broken down into a clearly organized format.
  2. The present location of the original archival documents should also be indicated.
  3. Also, if there are any images relevant to the archive, that would help with the overall attractiveness of the page. -- User: Sbatra86
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Dryton and Apollonia Archive. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:29, 17 December 2016 (UTC)Reply