Talk:Drizly
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
editThis article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Csirabella. Peer reviewers: Stacy Alabre, Cdunbarc.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 20:18, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Review
editLooking good! I did some copyediting and might have left a few templates. Next steps could include an:
- categories
- more links to other articles
- make sure it's not a Wikipedia:Orphan. -Reagle (talk) 21:42, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
Peer Review
editGood article, I think more information could be added for the description. In The Service section, more citations could be used. For example, in the claims about drizzly having "property ID," not taking a cut of orders, and how "The service is mainly provided through a smartphone app, available on iOS and Android platforms, apart from its website." Also maybe add another section as well, overall the article looks good. Stacy Alabre (talk) 14:41, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
Peer Review
editWell done, I liked how detailed the description of the service was. This is probably the most important section primarily because it's such a unique idea. I might suggest putting the history first, because that seems to be how a majority Wikipedia articles are. Also, I'm not sure if all of the information in the history section belongs there. You may or may not want to create an "Expansion" section once you start listing investors and locations, but it's up to you. But good job overall. Micheletti.t (talk) 18:01, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
Amazon of Liquor claim
editThe summary section includes the line "Known as the "Amazon for liquor"." but there doesn't appear to be a source supporting this claim. Does anyone have a source? Adding the "by whom" template until a source can be found. Catleeball (talk) 19:43, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
- Sources found: [1] [2] I'll go ahead and add them. Paradoxsociety 00:43, 29 July 2020 (UTC)