Talk:Drepanophycaceae

	Paleontology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Plants Low‑importance

	Plants portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Plants, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of plants and botany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PlantsWikipedia:WikiProject PlantsTemplate:WikiProject Plantsplant articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

External links modified edit

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Drepanophycaceae. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20120301123850/http://www.scientific-web.com/en/Biology/Plants/Lycopodiophyta/Drepanophycaceae.html to http://www.scientific-web.com/en/Biology/Plants/Lycopodiophyta/Drepanophycaceae.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 02:57, 15 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

Problem with Drepanophycaceae edit

Latest comment: 5 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

The only authority for the family treated by this article (as distinct from the characteristics of the genera of which it is composed) is some anonymous archived web page. This can't be classed as a reliable source.

The 13th edition of Engler's Syllabus der Pflanzenfamilien, Part 3 published in 2009, is a respected secondary or tertiary source (depending on your interpretation) of information on plant families. According to this (p. 290) the family includes Asteroxylon and the Asteroxylaceae, so all the article content about having vascularized microphylls goes out the window.

The reality is that there is little agreement about these early plant families and perhaps it is better not to have a page on them, but redirect up to the next higher rank. MisterCDE (talk) 04:10, 1 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

@MisterCDE: I agree that although the family is used in the literature, definitions vary. For example, Kenrick and Crane (1997) in their cladistic study place Asteroxylon in the clade Drepanophycaceae.^[1] Taylor, Taylor & Krings (2009) don't use the family at all, only the order Drepanophycales, and say that Asteroxylon is sometimes included in the Drepanophycales.^[2] The most recent paper I've found that uses the taxon Drepanophycaceae just uses it to classify a new species of Baragwanathia, but doesn't indicate the circumscription of the family.^[3] So I think there's a good case for up-merging this article into Drepanophycales, at the least. Peter coxhead (talk) 09:54, 1 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

@Peter coxhead: I have updated the article on Drepanophycales so that it is more or less ready to take over, if you wish to make that change. At the time I created the Drepanophycales article back in 2006, the attribution (taken from The Fossil Record) was to Pichi-Sermolli. However, that was a nomen nudum which is no longer acceptable, and IFPNI now credits Novák with the name. I also took the liberty of cutting and pasting from your remarks above into the Drepanophycales section on families, hope you don't mind! I wouldn't be surprised if there are more changes in future, since Asteroxylaceae has priority over Drepanophycaceae, and priority still applies to family names. MisterCDE (talk) 22:48, 2 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

References

^ Kenrick, P.; Crane, P.R. (1997), The origin and early diversification of land plants : a cladistic study, Washington & London: Smithsonian Institution Press, ISBN 978-1-56098-729-1, p. 213
^ Taylor, T.N.; Taylor, E.L.; Krings, M. (2009), Paleobotany The Biology and Evolution of Fossil Plants (2nd ed.), Amsterdam; Boston: Academic Press, ISBN 978-0-12-373972-8 {{citation}}: Unknown parameter |lastauthoramp= ignored (|name-list-style= suggested) (help), p. 270
^ Kraft, Petr; Kvaček, Zlatko (2017), "Where the lycophytes come from? – A piece of the story from the Silurian of peri-Gondwana", Gondwana Research, 45: 180–190, doi:10.1016/j.gr.2017.02.001 {{citation}}: Unknown parameter |lastauthoramp= ignored (|name-list-style= suggested) (help)

Add topic

[1] Kenrick, P.; Crane, P.R. (1997), The origin and early diversification of land plants : a cladistic study, Washington & London: Smithsonian Institution Press, ISBN 978-1-56098-729-1, p. 213

[2] Taylor, T.N.; Taylor, E.L.; Krings, M. (2009), Paleobotany The Biology and Evolution of Fossil Plants (2nd ed.), Amsterdam; Boston: Academic Press, ISBN 978-0-12-373972-8 {{citation}}: Unknown parameter |lastauthoramp= ignored (|name-list-style= suggested) (help), p. 270

[3] Kraft, Petr; Kvaček, Zlatko (2017), "Where the lycophytes come from? – A piece of the story from the Silurian of peri-Gondwana", Gondwana Research, 45: 180–190, doi:10.1016/j.gr.2017.02.001 {{citation}}: Unknown parameter |lastauthoramp= ignored (|name-list-style= suggested) (help)

[1]

[2]

[3]