Talk:Dragon Ball Z: Budokai Tenkaichi (series)/Archive 2

Unmerging

So, uh, yeah I'd be bold and change it on my own, but I know it will just get changed right back by DBZROCKS, so instead I'll just say my thing, and hope to sway people, I guess.

Two main reasons:

1. What's the harm in having more information/separate entries? Obviously there are a lot of people who dislike the merging, so that's a clear negative effect of it. What's the negative effect of unmerging? Who does it harm? Shouldn't we want Wikipedia to be the most complete source of information possible, and uh... doesn't having less informaiton make it less complete?

2. Notabliity. It's a big thing for Wikipedia, entries get deleted all the time for being non-notable... so uh, it just sems a little hypocritical to me that you would then deny entries to things that are notable. What could possibly make DBZBT2 any less notable than any other game? Operation Shadow, an N-Gage game that like 15 people have played is apparently notable enough to have an entry, but something that people have actually heard of doesn't qualify as notable? How does that make sense? Regardless of how much information there may for each game, they're no less notable than any other game that does warrant an article, and it's only fair that each game get its own entry.

So yeah. Either end the madness, or merge every game ever into its series article please. MK141 02:00, 15 November 2007 (UTC)

Other games have different storries, large changes in graphics gameplay, characters ect. This series has none of these things. It is the same Dragon Ball story, the same Dragon Ball chracters, the same gameplay ect. This article is large enough to hold any minor changes that are inbetween games, and infact covers them all. Yes the games are notable, yes they have an article, but there is no reason to have 3 articles on 3 games that are the same game with updates. DBZROCKSIts over 9000!!! 01:36, 16 November 2007 (UTC)

I agree with you. It's funny how they say to be bold and do something about it, but the minute somebody does, it gets reverted. Talk about hypocritical. 216.109.50.252 14:54, 15 November 2007 (UTC)

Official United States Release Date

The date that this game (Dragonball Z: Budokai Tenkaichi 3) was intended to be released originally on November 13, 2007 however, it is now sceduled to reach North American shores on December 3, 2007. I would just like to point that out to you all.

Check out the following link for additional information: http://wii.ign.com/objects/907/907834.html —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.33.69.93 (talk) 05:27, 16 November 2007 (UTC)

I got the Wii version today, my Gamestop got it in early.The Great Morgil 00:02, 1 December 2007 (UTC)

Character information

Okay so looking through the character list, I realized that some of the characters it said were introduced in BT2 might not be completely accurate. There are several characters on that list that were only introduced on the Wii version of the game. Now I know it's not that big of a deal, but I just thought I'd say there should be a note stating that the character was only on the Wii version so people don't go "Wait, that character was in BT2?" and then go digging for their disk. Just a thought, though. Maverick Leonhart (Talk | Contribs) 02:44, 22 November 2007 (UTC)

Tenkaichi 4

They've started working on Tenkaichi 4, and it may include a charcter creator. The link's on the article page. UltimaFighter 13:07, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

sorry but Tenkaichi 3 is the last series, and your link didn`t proof anything --125.162.38.44 (talk) 16:59, 5 November 2008 (UTC)

Dragon Ball Z: Budokai Tenkaichi 3

Who are Uncle Chin and unco same? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.186.79.250 (talk) 19:24, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

---

Will the classic controller work 4 this game??--DarkFierceDeityLink 16:48, 14 December 2007 (UTC)

Names of Characters

I just recently bought Tenkaichi 3 and I notice that this articles names of the characters are a little off. Like for instance, the article has Vegeta (End). In Tenkaichi 3, there's only one Vegeta (End) and that's the one we all know as Majin Vegeta. I'm just going to clean it up a bit. Just letting you guys know before people start reverting and whatnot. --Ryu-chan (Talk | Contributions) 17:34, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Sparking jp box.jpg

Image:Sparking jp box.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 05:42, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

Zeso

I have noticed this artcile does not mention Zeso at all. Should we incorporate him? --Kuriza (talk) 07:57, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

What the devil is a Zeso? 209.147.114.202 (talk) 18:23, 28 August 2008 (UTC)

Zeso is Frieza soldier. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.85.192.213 (talk) 21:29, 14 October 2008 (UTC)

Online support on Wii

Anyone care to mention the current instability of online for Budokai 3 for Wii?Sten28 (talk) 12:04, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

Seperation

These articles need to be seperated ASAP. As soon as someone does something bold, DBZRocks will ruin it all. I am not a good coder so someone else needs to do this. (talk)

Indeed, they should seperate as soon as possible. If you've got the time, unlike me, please edit and restore this article.

This arguing should be over after a year and a half! Don't be childish, change it back. Dr. F.C. Turner - [USERPAGE|USERTALK] - 09:56, 24 December 2008 (UTC)

transformations

I know its stupid, but when you transform, you deal more damage your enemy right? And the next one raises the damage again right? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.139.102.205 (talk) 21:54, 14 November 2008 (UTC)

Dragon Ball Z: Budokai Tenkaichi 4

I have a link[1] to suggest that Dragon Ball Z: Budokai Tenkaichi 4 will be releaced on Xbox 360, PS3, PS2 and Wii platforms, is it reliable? mcjakeqcool Mcjakeqcool (talk) 20:02, 25 April 2009 (UTC)

This is nothing more that just another AF situation. There is no Budokai Tenkaichi 4 and givin the track record with Bandai, there more than likely will never be one. Most of that page is doing nothing but speculating on the then resent rummors that the writed managed to obtain. Then there's the about Donny Clay's "involvment". Clay has the bad habbit of including himself in the production of games he had no real involement in. But besides all that, the page is a blog. So it is by default unreliable. The only time blogs are aceptible is when they are writen by people involved in the project. So in short, it can't be used. Sarujo (talk) 06:13, 26 April 2009 (UTC)

Ok, so then, this source is unreliable. mcjakeqcool Mcjakeqcool (talk) 18:10, 26 April 2009 (UTC)