Talk:Dragon (Shrek)
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Dragon (Shrek) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
 |
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors |
Personality? edit
ok, the personality bit seems like info that is unneeded and doesn't fit at all. IF you really want it back, tell me, but it's gone now.
The Wiggle Fish 06:22, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
Lots of vandalism, but doesn't seem to go away when I edit it, can someone try and get rid of it please.
Done it - TJ, 01/05/07 21:15 GMT
Fair use rationale for Image:Shrek dragon.JPG edit
Image:Shrek dragon.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 11:41, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:Shrek dragon.JPG edit
Image:Shrek dragon.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 20:27, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
Caption Box Error edit
I noticed that the following appears in a green-lined box: "Dragon N/A N/A Gender {{{male}}} Type Dragon Spouse Donkey Other Family 6 hybrid "dronkey" children Voiced by {{{Mike Myers}}} Appearance(s) Shrek Shrek 2 Shrek the Third"
When it should display the following: "Dragon Caption N/A Image N/A Gender {{{female}}} Type Dragon Spouse Donkey Other Family 6 hybrid "dronkey" children Voiced by N/A Appearance(s) Shrek Shrek 2 Shrek the Third"
There was no way to edit this information out, so I deleted the caption box and put the info in the article.
LightningPower (talk) 15:34, 21 February 2009 (UTC)LightningPower
On sourcing from fan wikis edit
Can we talk about the current state of § Film series compared to the long-standing Wikipedia version? In all honesty and without trying to be insulting, the current version (copied from a fan wiki) reads like a fan wiki, down to the heavy reliance on the word “then”. It seems excessively long and detailed for the article, overly casual (“a big smooch”?), and grammatically dubious. —96.8.24.95 (talk) 01:56, 11 July 2023 (UTC)