Talk:Downwinders

Latest comment: 23 hours ago by Cherubj in topic Changed a conjunction

Other countries edit

This topic is relevant to all countries which have tested nuclear weapons, and to other civilian accidents, but only American incidents are covered. At the moment this article doesn't mention the Chernobyl disaster once. 81.155.57.75 (talk) 15:45, 14 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

I added links to some other articles, but I'm not competent to rewrite this page. Can someone help? 81.155.57.75 (talk) 16:30, 14 July 2010 (UTC)Reply


Opinion in the Santa Fe New Mexican newspaper, Saturday, May 14, 2011: http://m.santafenewmexican.com/Opinion/Second-thoughts-of--downwinders--in-New-MexicoWikiphan44 (talk) 23:24, 23 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

I could write a section dedicated to the Soviet Union but i can't rewite the article RomanK79 (talk) 10:14, 2 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

Pregnant women edit

It seems a bit odd to me that, as emotional a subject as pregnancy is, the subject of pregnancy in fallout situations should have all kinds of studies associated with it. In the current article, there are only two citations: one to pregnant women's emotional health, and one on ideas for better public health systems. The citation required flag has been ignored.

I think perhaps wording like "Specifically, the pregnant woman must receive a radiation dose between the 10th and 40th day of pregnancy high enough to cause mutations, but not high enough to abort or kill the mother", may be part of the problem. Does this mean that mutations caused by radioactivity just don't count if the happen after 3 months? For most certainly, they happen throughout life; every generation passes about 150 discrete mutations from the pattern they inherit from their parents to their offspring, and that's from all sources, not just artificial radioactivity. Or does it mean that if a mutation happens when the fetus is a month old, that in itself puts the mother at risk of death? The whole paragraph is assertions and fuzzy, possibly wishful thinking in search of proof, when I would think the subject should be pinpoint, scientifically crucial.

If downwinders are going to be heard, they need better than a Jenny McCarthy level of representation on the subject, mixed with speculation on how John Wayne died that skips most of the subject material. SkoreKeep (talk) 08:53, 5 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hanford Thyroid Disease Study edit

This study was not "inconclusive", as this article's author claims. From the study's summary:

"The percentages of people with each kind of thyroid disease or with ultrasound abnormalities were about the same regardless of their estimated radiation dose from Hanford’s iodine-131."

"The findings do not prove that Hanford radiation had no effect on the health of the area population. However, they show that if there is an increased risk of thyroid disease from exposure to Hanford’s iodine-131, it is probably too small to observe using the best epidemiologic methods available."

That is a conclusion, agree with it or not.

96.226.232.173 (talk) 18:44, 15 January 2015 (UTC)D.M.SMITHReply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Downwinders. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

 Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:07, 16 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Downwinders. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:17, 13 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Missouri? edit

Utah nuclear test fallout affects me now. I was growing up in St. Louis. 160.226.138.91 (talk) 08:51, 14 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Wiki Education assignment: HIST 121 - U.S. History since 1877 edit

  This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 1 February 2024 and 10 May 2024. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Cherubj, HIST121-Augie-student (article contribs). Peer reviewers: Schnickelfritz66, 23omoell04.

— Assignment last updated by Public-historian-90 (talk) 13:36, 2 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Adding a paragraph on the "compensation" section edit

The paragraph talks about the amendment of the 1990 RECA act to the 2000 version and some major updates that came with it. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:HIST121-Augie-student (talk) 20:20, 7 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Added a new paragraph edit

I removed the first sentence from the live article, under the compensation subtopic and added details to make a new paragraph out of it. Cherubj (talk) 20:34, 7 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Minor edit on the 'Nevada' section edit

On the last sentence of the third paragraph, changed "A 2010 report evaluating data on thyroid cancer incidence from 1973 to 2004 also supports a relationship between exposure from fallout and increased thyroid cancer incidence" to "A 2010 report evaluating data on thyroid cancer incidence from 1973 to 2004 also supported a relationship between exposure from fallout and increased thyroid cancer incidence" for tense consistency and added commas "...which, with the exception of a few test failures, did not release fallout."https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:HIST121-Augie-student (talk) 00:17, 8 May 2024 (UTC) also, on the last sentence of the second paragraph, rephrased "...which were later collected by the Atomic Energy Commission to gather data about radiation levels." to "...which the Atomic Energy Commission later collected to gather data about radiation levels."Reply

Minor edit on the 'Nuclear Testing' section edit

Replaced the very last sentence with "These nuclear tests infused vast quantities of radioactive material into the world's atmosphere, resulting in widely dispersed radiation and its subsequent deposition as global fallout." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:HIST121-Augie-student (talk) 00:30, 8 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Fixed comma splice edit

Added a comma in the first sentence of the second paragraph.

More generally, the term can also include those communities and individuals who are exposed to ionizing radiation and other emissions due to the regular production and maintenance of coal ash, nuclear weapons, nuclear power, nuclear waste, and geothermal energy. …” instead of “…More generally, the term can also include those communities and individuals who are exposed to ionizing radiation and other emissions due to the regular production and maintenance of coal ash, nuclear weapons, nuclear power, nuclear waste and geothermal energy….” Cherubj (talk) 14:26, 10 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Added a missing comma edit

added a missing comma on the first paragraph.

…ranges primarily in Arizona, Nevada, New Mexico, and Utah but also… instead of …ranges primarily in Arizona, Nevada, New Mexico and Utah but also… Cherubj (talk) 14:34, 10 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Changed a conjunction edit

Changed the conjunction "as" to "when" in the last paragraph as it's more appropriate in the sentence.

"In fact, the health effects of radon were first widely acknowledged when Mormon and Native American miners who hardly smoke (the main reason for lung cancer) had high incidences of lung cancer." Cherubj (talk) 14:43, 10 May 2024 (UTC)Reply