Talk:Dow University of Health Sciences

Latest comment: 3 years ago by Spike 'em in topic Research & development at Dow University

Untitled edit

This article goes into quite a lot of detail about the construction of the college, but I'm not sure whether it should be left as-is or condensed into something else. Also, the timeline-ish format may paraprhase the source website a little too closely. Jeeves 05:27, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Dow University of Health Sciences. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:04, 13 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Research & development at Dow University edit

Contents of subject topic is being deleted without any established logic. Neither Primary nor self-published source is cited. Research contents qualify the Wikipedia:No original research#AEIS and content-material mainly derived from reliable secondary sources, no original publication such as [1] provided. In order to avoid labelling of promotion only secondary sources adopted for general awareness and promotion of hope in the larger interest of human being especially Pakistani nation. This is not a promotion it is the very basis of each and every encyclopedia to encompass beneficial research to promote further development. As far as my understanding this Sharing of knowledge is the core of WP. Research work of Dow University or any other institute of Pakistan is a global teamwork on Plasma basis therapy [2]

My dear deleting expert this bio research is a beneficial material for advancement and hope to future life saving efforts in the COVID-19 pandemic combating. Nannadeem (talk) 10:57, 14 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

I appreciate re-action of GorgeCustersSabre. Nannadeem (talk) 13:49, 14 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

The information about COVID 19 research seems to be news reporting and fail WP:NOTNEWS. This section will likely be be obsolete in a few months. Spike 'em (talk) 14:09, 21 May 2020 (UTC)Reply