Talk:Doug Burgum/Archive 1

Archive 1

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Doug Burgum. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160215232447/http://www.ndhorizons.com/featured/index.asp?ID=16 to http://www.ndhorizons.com/featured/index.asp?ID=16
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160223144439/https://www.ndsu.edu/ndsu/news/magazine/vol01_issue02/burgum.html to http://www.ndsu.edu/ndsu/news/magazine/vol01_issue02/burgum.html
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.prairiebizmag.com/event/article/id/13202/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:27, 13 September 2017 (UTC)

Utterly confusing table

The table at the end of the article, mentioning several politicians including Kamala Harris and Kristi Noem, and mentioning some things about precedence, is utterly confusing.

I stared at it for five minutes and have no idea what it is there for, or what information is actually contained in it.

I am sure that it is possible to design a table that is even more worthless than this one.

(I just can't think of how at the moment.) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:200:c082:2ea0:4c85:97e8:e26a:8609 (talk)

I agree that the "order of precedence" table is unnecessary, and have removed it. Walt Yoder (talk) 23:34, 18 May 2023 (UTC)

Reuters, May 28th, says he is running for President

His hat is in the ring Sudzydoogiedawg (talk) 11:17, 28 May 2023 (UTC)

my error! It says he is set to run, on May 27th@ Sudzydoogiedawg (talk) 11:22, 28 May 2023 (UTC)

Several news stories say he will announce on June 7. Anon a mouse Lee (talk) 23:51, 28 May 2023 (UTC)

Just updated it to say that, not sure why it wasn't lol Los Pobre (talk) 01:38, 5 June 2023 (UTC)

"large" software company

In the introduction the adjective "large" is used to describe Great Plains Software, a company that only employed 2,200 and was sold for just over $1 billion. By tech industry standards this is hardly "large". The word comes off as self-serving and is unnecessary. Watari19 (talk) 16:28, 7 June 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 7 June 2023

I don't know the governor from Adam so I really have no opinion of him. Even so, this small article clearly demonstrates the political biases of WP and its editors. Using semi-subliminal phrases like passed a series of anti-trans laws, then linking it (anti-trans) to "transphobia" shows that it was written by one person, from one person's point-of-view. That is not encyclopedia-like. Knowledgebases are discussed and edited before publishing, not after. That is what makes them useful. Could it have been "laws considered trans-phobic by some" - or something to that effect? No. Are we so afraid that someone might actually soften a stance or make a truly neutral statement? Is that a reason to prohibit editing? We don't know that the governor himself is actually anti-trans. Anti-trans, as used in this article is political speech and should be - re-phrased. 71.215.98.163 (talk) 17:13, 7 June 2023 (UTC)

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. --Pinchme123 (talk) 17:24, 7 June 2023 (UTC)