WikiProject iconDisambiguation
WikiProject iconThis disambiguation page is within the scope of WikiProject Disambiguation, an attempt to structure and organize all disambiguation pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, you can edit the page attached to this talk page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.

Requested move 15 April 2016

edit
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: withdrawn (non-admin closure). SSTflyer 08:37, 22 April 2016 (UTC)Reply



DouchebagDouchebag (disambiguation) – The primary topic for "douchebag" is Douche, or its slang use, which is covered in the Douche article. Douchebag should redirect to Douche. Alternatively, this disambiguation page may be deleted per WP:TWODABS, with a hatnote pointing to Douchebag (film) at the Douchebag article. SSTflyer 14:31, 15 April 2016 (UTC)Reply


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

why is Douchebag fully protected rather than semi

edit

For what reason is the article Douchebag full-protected instead of semi-protected? Angela Maureen (talk) 17:19, 27 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

@September 1988: Have a look at the edit history, particularly the edits before the impositition of each prot. Or have a look at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive867#Appeal of RFPP decline for Douchebag. Or at the editnotice for this talk page. --Redrose64 (talk) 19:36, 27 September 2016 (UTC)Reply
https://theoatmeal.com/comics/tesla is the reason for all of it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.39.175.199 (talk) 05:59, 10 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

IPA useful?

edit

It would be /ˈduːʃˌbæɡ/ --Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 23:19, 9 October 2016 (UTC)Reply