Talk:Double J

Requested move 7 December 2022

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: not moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 16:41, 15 December 2022 (UTC)

---

• Double J → Double J (disambiguation)
• Double J (radio station) → Double J

– Of those listed that actually use the term "Double J" (or the phonetically similar "Double Jay"), Double J (radio station) is the clear primary topic, receiving a significantly higher number of monthly page views than the others. Ureteric stent receives more views, but very few come from Double-J stent, so it is naturally disambiguated. Anarchyte (talk) 11:05, 7 December 2022 (UTC)

• Oppose. There's no primary topic with respect to usage: the dab page was viewed almost a 100 times in October [1], but apparently none of the links there received the minimum of 10 clicks required for it to end up in the WP:Clickstream dataset [2]. I haven't looked closely, but it doesn't strike me as there is a primary topic with with respect to long-term significance either. – Uanfala (talk) 15:05, 7 December 2022 (UTC)
• Oppose, Triple J and Jeff Jarrett have higher notability. 162 etc. (talk) 17:14, 7 December 2022 (UTC)

  Jeff Jarrett mentions "Double J" three times, in one section for 1993-1994. Definitely more notable overall, but not in contention for the primary topic. Anarchyte (talk) 12:20, 9 December 2022 (UTC)

  He is undoubtedly more well-known as Jeff Jarrett, but also known as Double J. See, for example, his writeup on WWE.com. 162 etc. (talk) 17:45, 9 December 2022 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.