 | A news item involving Dorothy P. Rice was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the In the news section on 7 March 2017. |  |
 | Dorothy P. Rice has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: November 20, 2017. (Reviewed version). |
 | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Early life?
editWhile giving its subject's birthplace and date, this article says nothing about her family or even what her birth name was. This is a big hole. --Piledhigheranddeeper (talk) 21:01, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
- @Piledhigheranddeeper: Thank you for adding the info. :-) Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 02:51, 11 April 2017 (UTC)
GA Review
edit| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Dorothy P. Rice/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Casliber (talk · contribs) 06:16, 29 September 2017 (UTC)
I'll take a look and make straightforward copyedits as I go and jot queries below:
- Err, it's lead is a bit small...actually the article is pretty slim overall. Looking over some sources, there are some more biographical facts that can be added, see here that mentions her parents were Jewish immigrants from Poland, and here which covers her legacy better. Anyway, I would feel more comfortable if it's been fleshed out a little more.
- Thanks, Casliber. Will work on this ASAP now that I'm back editing! Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 04:13, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
- No dramas...Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 09:41, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
- Thanks, Casliber. Will work on this ASAP now that I'm back editing! Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 04:13, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
- @The ed17: ...pinnnngggg Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 04:48, 30 October 2017 (UTC)
- @Casliber: Sorry for the delay! I've added what I can from Google Books and my university's library resources. Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 22:09, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
- @The ed17: ...aaaand the lead? Just a little bigger then....Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 23:59, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
- @Casliber: Sorry about that! Expanded now. :-) Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 02:42, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
- @The ed17: ...aaaand the lead? Just a little bigger then....Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 23:59, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
- @Casliber: Sorry for the delay! I've added what I can from Google Books and my university's library resources. Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 22:09, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
- @The ed17: ...pinnnngggg Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 04:48, 30 October 2017 (UTC)
1. Well written?:
- Prose quality:
- Manual of Style compliance:
2. Factually accurate and verifiable?:
- References to sources:
- Citations to reliable sources, where required:
- No original research:
3. Broad in coverage?:
- Major aspects:
- Focused:
4. Reflects a neutral point of view?:
- Fair representation without bias:
5. Reasonably stable?
- No edit wars, etc. (Vandalism does not count against GA):
6. Illustrated by images, when possible and appropriate?:
- Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
Overall:
- Pass or Fail: - neat little article. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 04:08, 20 November 2017 (UTC)