Talk:Dornoch

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Royal burgh? edit

Dornoch is a royal burgh? It is not clear to me that it still qualifies. I believe Scottish burghs were aboshished in 1975.
Laurel Bush (talk) 15:33, 24 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

You are right, its a former royal burgh. Unfortunately, most times I try changing this in articles I get (mild) abuse for daring to suggest that the status is no longer extant. See for instance this User_talk:Lozleader/Archive_1#Lauder. The term is in informal use of course, but there are no royal burghs any more, and there are plenty of references in legislation and local authority documents to "former burghs", but this appears to be an emotive argument where positive evidence is no competition to sentiment. *sigh* Lozleader (talk) 20:02, 29 April 2008 (UTC)Reply


Death? edit

Why the descrepancy in the dates she was condemned to death and the stone? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Johnnyarbogast (talkcontribs) 06:13, 7 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

As it says in the article, sources disagree.--Shantavira|feed me 16:51, 25 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

What do they call people who come from Dornoch? edit

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Dornoch. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:24, 13 September 2017 (UTC)Reply