Talk:Dope.security

Latest comment: 1 year ago by Arbor to SJ in topic Contested deletion

Contested deletion edit

This page is not unambiguously promotional, because... It includes citations to secondary sources coverage, so this organization meets notability guidelines. --Arbor to SJ (talk) 15:27, 13 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

@Arbor to SJ:
  1. Crunchbase is not a reliable source.  N
  2. Dope Security's own website and company-authored document are primary sources, which can't establish notability.  N
  3. Silicon Republic looks reliable but a sizeable portion of the article is an interview with company staff, which is also a primary source.  N
  4. Security Week seems reliable, but given the problems with the other sources, I don't know if it's enough to establish notability.
--Drm310 🍁 (talk) 16:39, 13 November 2022 (UTC)Reply
The source cited was TechCrunch, not CrunchBase. Also, I've added another secondary source (FinSMEs); the number of secondary sources provided should be sufficient to meet WP:NOTABILITY. Arbor to SJ (talk) 01:26, 14 November 2022 (UTC)Reply